Darn you Carey Perloff,  I lost my bet

My husband and I had tickets to see “Arcadia” by Tom Stoppard at A.C.T. in San Francisco directed by A.C.T.’s artistic director, Carey Perloff.   My husband doesn’t like the play, largely due to its length.   I saw the play in a production by Center Theatre Group while I was in college, and enjoyed it. (I also didn’t find it to be overly long.)  Prior to leaving, I endured taunts about dragging him to a four-hour long play, I responded that it was only two-and-a-half hours long.   Todays production clocked in at four hours and twenty minutes.   I had to eat crow before my husband.  So, I say again, “Darn you Carey Perloff!”

So what happened?   Well part-way through the second scene and actor left the stage and the curtain came down and the house lights came up.   After several minutes the usher came down and there was a technical problem, and to please remain in our seats.   A while later, an announcement was made that a cast member had been taken ill.   A while later we were told the show would resume in twenty minutes.  About an hour after the curtain was prematurely rung down, it went back up, with a new actor on stage.

At the end of my rant, I will specifically state details of my opinion of the production, which we both quite enjoyed.    What comes first is my issue with business as usual in theatre.   On professional contracts, understudies are not usually required to rehearse with the cast, and often do not start learning the show until opening night.   This is a cost saving rule negotiated by the producers.   Additionally, understudies very rarely get rehearsal with the rest of the company.  Instead the stage manager rehearses them separate from the cast on mornings when the stage managers are not otherwise engaged.  Lastly, understudies are not at the theatre once the curtain goes up.  (In fact, if my memory serves on the LORT contract, they are not even required to be at the theatre unless called.)  This is the way it is.   Today was a clear example of why it is a bad idea.

If the understudy was at the theatre, it should have taken no more than thirty minutes to get into costume and make up, and get on stage.    With an hour delay, it is clear our understudy had to get to the theatre before any getting ready could be done.

Our understudy, a very hardworking Robert Parsons did not know the show.   Inauspiciously, he had to call line several times in his first scene.  Thereafter, he carried pages of the script around with him looking when he needed to.   This did not completely eliminate the need of calling line but it dramatically reduced it.  Parsons also did not know his blocking.  Other cast members where giving him hints about where to go, but he still was out of his light for several key moments.

Prior to today, I said repeatedly that i have never been disappointed in an understudy’s performance.   That is still somewhat true, Parsons is a fine actor and with adequate rehearsal would have been outstanding.  I am disappointed in the realities of theatre.  At a professional theatre, I expect the show to go on.   I have seen understudies on tour, on Broadway, and in Los Angeles.  I’d have to look to see if this is totally true, but in my three years as a subscriber to Center Theatre Group, I never saw a show without an understudy appearing on the night we had tickets.  And in all of the cases before today, if I hadn’t known there was an understudy, I wouldn’t have known it was an understudy.   That was not what was experienced at A.C.T. today. Audiences deserve better than today.   The playwright deserves better than today.   I would say the director deserves better than today, but as artistic director of the theatre, as well as the director Perloff was at least partially responsible for these realities.   The union contract does not bar producers from adequately preparing understudies, it just gives producers the option to risk it.  My guess is that usually it is not a problem.   Today, A.C.T. earned a lot of ill-will from an audience.

An unprepared understudy going on hurts the production.   The pacing slowed down.   Ignoring the time we waited for the understudy to arrive at the theatre, get into costume, and the part of the scene they repeated, the play still ran longer than its two hour and forty five minute running time that the house staff informed us of as we had our tickets scanned.

The ushers informed us we could trade our tickets for another day.   I live 210 miles from the theatre, that was not an option for us.   The family in front of us had come from Sacramento to see the show using a bus or train.   They had allowed time for the show, a quick dinner and then back to catch their transportation home.  They asked an usher if they would make it.   He advised they try to skip dinner and try find a cab to meet their transportation.   They left during the curtain call.  I usually consider that an appallingly rude act ,but in this case I understood.   I hope they made it home tonight.

The play ran so long ,that the parking was far more expensive than the woman in front of us at the parking garage had budgeted.  She was shocked, and scrambled in her purse for more money.   Perloff was coming down the stairs in the parking structure as we were going up.   I am not sure what she was saying to her audience, but I doubt it was enough to get immediate forgiveness for what happened.   As pleased as the audience was with the show, and as loudly as they applauded for  Parsons, the audience was greatly annoyed at the extra hour-long intermission in the middle of the first act.

In one sense an actor taking ill is an unforeseen event, and in another sense it is not.  What is unforeseen is which actor will be taken ill and when.  That an actor will be taken ill during a run, is something that can be prepared for, that is why understudies exist.

What went a long way to redeem the whole debacle  for me today was that Perloff put together a damn fine show.  Douglas Schmidt’s set was clean, simple and beautiful.   Robert Wierzel’s tight beautiful lighting told the audience  at every moment when we were, which is especially important on Gus’s final entrance.   With the exception of the fact that the understudies costume did not seem to fit correctly, Alex Jaeger’s costume design was great, especially the period scenes.

Jack Cutmore-Scott had an understated lunacy about his performance of Septimus Hodge that could turn quickly to a heart-rending introspection.   Rebeckah Brockman as Thomasina expertly rode the line between innocent naïvety and ageless wisdom.    Nicholas Pelczar, Anthony Fusco and Nick Gabriel were fun, funny and passionate foils to Hodge’s plans.   Gretchen Egolf as Hannah was less “showy” than other actresses I’ve seen in the role, and her slow burning anger was a joy to watch.

Carey Perloff’s direction really seemed to find the fun, beauty and nuance in Stoppard’s script.  Her production was more understated than others I have seen, and refreshingly so. The period scenes sparkled like New Year’s Eve’s champaign, the modern scenes a deep undercurrents like a fine wine.  The final scene didn’t play up the pathos of death common in other productions I have seen, instead concentrating on the simple beauty of two people finding each other for a brief moment dancing.   My husband wondered if the audience remembered that Thomasina would die within an hour of the curtain falling at the end of the play.   I think they remember.   I think focussing on the death is siding with the neo-classists and the scientists who think that cold truth is the most important thing, instead of siding with the romantics who will take peace and beauty regardless of the cost.    This debate between my husband and I echos the debates had between the characters of the play, which means ultimately Perloff clearly, and cleverly, succeeded in bring Stoppard’s philosophical argument to this audience.

Now, if only it wasn’t four hours and twenty minutes long, start to finish.

6 responses to “Darn you Carey Perloff,  I lost my bet

  1. I was also at the same performance as you last afternoon. I’m also an AEA member in full standing. I agree with your assessment on the lack of professionalism displayed. It was appalling and a biz-are experience. Now, it’s time to spew a bit of randomness of what I know and what I’ve always expected or been asked of:

    – An understudy is as important a cast member as any other.
    – There are no small parts, only small directors (and stage managers obviously from last nights performance).
    – Understudies are a full member of an ‘ensemble’ (remember that word…it used to come up a lot in the theatre).
    – AEA work is not only rare, but a privilege for those lucky few that land parts these days and get paid for it.
    – Every cast member on call, whether on stage or not that night (such as understudies), should be onsite and be ready to support the rest of the ensemble (there’s that word again). Sometimes, understudies sit in the audience or relax around the theatre, but they still support their fellow professionals by being present. 99% of it is showing up.

    My friend and I didn’t come as far away as you did, but we fought massive traffic to be there in time for that performance. My friend paid $100 for two tickets. We also paid for parking. We toyed with possibly staying after the huge delay in time. For one, seats 5th row center opened up! Also, being AEA I felt bad that an understudy might go on without an audience in attendance, so I thought about giving professional support.

    We ended up not staying. The suspense of disbelief was broken, and so was our time limit. Based on what you relay, I’m now so glad we left.

    I also want to say that I did not enjoy the first scene. I thought the writing was banal and the acting full of horrid stock renditions without any internal life or external truthful interaction. It was like watching acting school 2nd year all over again. “Stare and pretend to care” They could have made it so much more if they directed it beyond base farce. There was so much possibility there.

    The second scene started to open up for me when the lights came up but I didn’t trust it enough to enjoy it. Then it happened. I actually thought he walked off to get a line. That would have impressed the hell out of me BTW.

    As for ACT, they won’t get any more money from me, that I can guarantee. Then again, honestly, I haven’t seen any good acting or had good theatre experiences in the SF bay area in what few times I’ve been out the last 11 years. I guess I’m still longing for Off-B’wy and what I’m used to in professionals – paid or not. There’s something cheap and stocky about equity performances around here. It may be just me. Oh well…

    In final, my friend is not an actress, and she was totally depressed about the experience. Her takeaway is that she would rather stay at home and watch a good movie. You don’t get ripped off in time, distance, and cash, you get great quality for your dollar, the actors show up on time, and it doesn’t jar your own creativity with negativity. She’s a writer BTW, and was psyched to want to see a play by Tom S.

    As for me, I’m not into these kind of intellectual manneristic british pseudo comedies, really. If you force feed me something, give me Pinter or something with meat for christ sakes. But hell, I guess if you want good theatre, you have to do it yourself these days, and I was a guest.

    BTW, I would have volunteered to go on in 10 minutes notice last afternoon, and probably could spend another 5 minutes getting all the lines down. But why bother if they allow someone to take a script on and call “line” or “yes” it in all the time.

    Hmmm…next time, hey you ACT…give me a call and I’ll understudy via Skype for equity waiver.

    • I’m so sorry your friend had a theatre-going-ending experience. I do like Stoppard’s play, and compared to other productions I have seen (professional and university), this was my favorite production. Thanks for your comments! I hope ACT sees them so that they understand what damage this incident did, and can learn from it.

  2. Well, glad you had a good time.

    As for ACT, I believe that their box office will reflect the comment more than my little rant. The line outside was frightening. I didn’t expect that many people would leave, honestly. It’s a terrible comment.

    I felt really bad for those people who came from out of town, and who expected more from the afternoon (such as the elderly tourist couple in front of me who left after 30 minutes of waiting). They are the real valuable people you need to win hearts and minds, not me – not just for ACT but for all theatre groups. It give all theaters a bad rep. Those are the people that come and go back home and support their own community theaters. Now, they won’t bother or give it a suspicious curve. Its hard to make a case when a LORT-A level fails like it did.

    Anyway, best luck to your next performance experience and your continued blog. Cheers BK

  3. Thank you, Christopher, for your absolutely accurate and thoughtful blog, and for the responses. You and all of ACT’s amazing audience deserved better, and we are thoroughly revamping both our understudy and audience communications policies to avoid this happening again. In my 20 years at ACT I have never had an actor get stricken in the middle of a show like that, after the understudy had departed, but clearly anything can happen and our audience deserves to see the show it paid for, in a timely and professional way. I extend my deepest apologies to you and the other audience members who were at Saturday’s matinee, and hope you will give us a chance to share the show with you again under better circumstances. To the gentleman whose friend has now eschewed live theater, I want to say– please don’t give up on the whole art form because of one unfortunate incident! We who make live theater deliver what we promise almost 100% of the time– it’s the fact that is it live and NOT a movie that makes it so human but, alas, also so fallible. I have been at the ballet when a dancer broke her leg. I have been at Lincoln Center when a singer had a stroke. It’s an awful awful thing, for audiences and artists alike. But perhaps it also reminds us of our common humanity. If you don’t want to come back to ACT, support another theater. It matters!

    • Ms. Perloff,
      Thank you for your comment. I want to reiterate how much I enjoyed the production, once it was back up and running. Having worked in both professional theatre, waiver theatre, and college theatre, I know things happen. (Once long ago, I as a college sophomore and Assistant Stage Manager had to go on stage in place of an actor who left the theatre for reasons of his own at intermission. I played so far against type (wrong race, wrong build, wrong…. anything but gender), that I know the unthinkable happens.) My frustration came, not as much from your policies (which match every professional company I have worked with) but the fact that standard operating procedure does not have understudies ready at opening night. I have questioned that wisdom with many a producer, and received the answer that the unthinkable never happens in professional theatre. Well, now it has. I thank you and your colleagues at A.C.T. for revisiting the standard understudy procedure. I don’t know if we will be able to return to the city to see the Arcadia uninterrupted, but I am personally very excited about next year’s season.
      Yours,
      Chris

  4. We stumbled over here different page and thought I may as well
    check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to going over your web page again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s